The Politics Of Health: Feature ArticleThe Meltdown of Public Health and Personal FreedomWednesday, August 02, 2006Byron Richards, CCN The United States government and especially the FDA have lost credibility in assisting you with your personal health. Instead, they have placed the vast resources of our federal government behind a twisted public health agenda that perpetuates the profits of the elite and the unspoken primary agenda of eugenics. The daily assault on American freedom is now like living in the twilight zone. Public health policy, under the guise of public benefit, is a primary tool of a despotic regime. It is a system designed to convince Americans to hand over their remaining freedoms, as a decayed government grapples to maintain control over its increasingly restless citizens. Health care that is patient-centered is based on a personal relationship with health care professionals that act as patient sponsors, promoting and defending the interests of the patient as the primary importance. In a free society, a majority of individuals can establish an emotional bond in the doctor-patient relationship that inspires hopefulness. There are many health options a patient may choose to fortify personal health, options that are naturally embraced by physicians whom have the patient as their top priority.
Public health, by contrast, plays on the fear of disease to persuade individuals to give up their personal rights in the name of the “greater good.” If we had truly benevolent leaders, public health programs could be used for the benefit of the citizens. Instead, we have a pathetic combination of drug sales, environmental poisoning, military objectives, and herd control masquerading as public health.
Of course, we are constantly reminded of the great wisdom of public health. When 16-year-old Abraham Cherrix refused to take another round of chemotherapy, his parents quickly found the state wanted custody of their child so they could enforce “health care.” Not only is the child sick and struggling; now he must go to court simply to defend his own health freedom. In patient-centered care, his doctor would be standing up for him. In totalitarian public health, doctors quiver in their boots rather than rock the boat.
Yes, we live in the era where the doctor-patient relationship is defined by laws created for drug companies, held in place by state public health laws and a legion of whimpy doctors who cow-toe and live in fear of their licensing boards. Any person needing medical care has two main problems; the health issue needing improvement and the perverse system of public healthcare masquerading as personal health. Consumer beware, the latter is oftentimes far more dangerous than the health problem. A patient can no longer count on his or her doctor to be their advocate, a very sad state of affairs.
Vaccination programs are not for any one person’s health. In fact, vaccinations carry considerable risk of health damage. Up to 1% of the children who are vaccinated have deficient sIGA immune responses, meaning they are likely to be made quite ill by the vaccinations. Throw in some mercury as a preservative and use chicken myelin protein to grow the vaccines, and we have a recipe for nerve damage. Yes, all children could be screened before hand to see who is at risk. However, that is patient-centered care and costly to providers as well as casting doubt on the safety of immunizations. Public health based on eugenics likes to see the weak eliminated from society. And yes, an autistic child will cost the parents one million dollars in extra healthcare expenses, which ought to keep the parents too busy working on behalf of Big Pharma to raise much protest. We are one step from socialized medicine, about to plunge into the European model of degenerate public health. In plain and simple American English, that means the complete loss of personal health freedom. The “greatest generation” that fought to defend the world from Nazi takeover now finds themselves the unwilling puppets in the drive for socialized medicine. The elite have stripped away their pensions, reduced the purchasing power of their social security dollars, and left them trying to decide between poor quality food and overpriced drugs. Such a large population of Americans is backed into a corner – socialized medicine sounds good to them. Hitler would be smiling. Yes, Hitler knew all too well of the vital importance of public health to control the herd. During his rise to power he used public health programs as an excuse to eliminate health freedoms for all German people (they have never recovered). Then he blended Nazi public health with his military agenda, silencing those who objected with his very own Department of Homeland Security. In the name of public health’s greater good, Nazi doctors killed hundreds of thousands of Germans and Jews while performing hideous experiments on “undesirable citizens.” After all, they were scheduled for termination as part of Hitler’s eugenics (patterned after the Rockefeller model). The Nuremberg Code was established as a world-wide code of ethics to prevent this type of atrocity from ever occurring again; however, the U.S. government under the false guise of national security has repeatedly violated it ever since it was created. [Read Fight for Your Health.] And so you say, that was then – it is different now. Is it? This month the extent of the Chinese government-sponsored body organ transplant program became painfully clear to the world. As a matter of routine, prisoners waiting for execution are killed when a person requesting an organ matches their tissue. Typically, the organ recipient is waiting in a hospital nearby as the organs are removed in an ambulance ride between the execution and the hospital. And its not just criminals, its political dissidents that comprise the largest pool of unwilling body organ donors. Practitioners of Falun Gong, who use meditation to improve mind-body health, are on their government’s hit list. Their organs are typically taken from living donors in concentration camps, whom are killed by the operation. In the elite eugenics model, such brutality makes perfectly good sense. A government has defined an undesirable segment of the population needing termination. What difference does it make if their organs are used for others? And what does our government do when a New York physician of Chinese heritage, Wenyi Wang, has the nerve to confront Chinese President Hu Jintao at a public press conference? The Secret Service throws her in jail for a day! And President Bush apologizes to the Chinese leader. When she comes out, the elite media refuses to run her story. Instead, China funds American debt and is interwoven into the fabric of our society. Bush smiles at the Chinese leader and shakes his hand, while the Chinese government conducts medical crimes no different than the Nazi doctors of years past. American consumers keep buying Chinese, letting our wallets perpetuate the human rights violations. Chinese websites have advertised organ replacement in three weeks time. And Americans and Europeans line up for their Chinese body parts. All the while, the Bush administration seeks to gain control over the public like his peer in China. A case in point is his current attempt to tie public health emergencies to the confiscation of firearms. The fact that our government would even attempt such a ploy is testament to the fact that the people of America are currently under a government that believes in totalitarian control at the expense of rights, including health rights. For example, if there was a pandemic flu outbreak, the Homeland Security appropriations bill (HR 5441) proposes that federal agents be allowed to confiscate firearms during this public health emergency. A last minute amendment defeated this proposal (Senate vote 84-16), preserving our rights. Interesting is the list of anti-American Democrats (like Kennedy) voting in favor of federal police power. Amongst them we find the cream of the crop, in terms of attempting to suppress health freedom in America. On the list is Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Diane Feinstein (D-CA), and Charles Schumer (D-NY). These despicable politicians have a history of voting against your health options, seeking to eliminate useful nutritional products from the market (S722) and currently trying to entangle supplement manufacturers in a public health scam that will drastically undermine patient’s health options. Hillary Clinton is particularly skilled at manipulating public opinion, and is a huge backer of socialized medicine and public health at the expense of citizen’s rights. The reason her healthcare proposals failed so miserably in her husband’s administration is because she alienated the vested-interests who profit from keeping people sick. She has re-invented herself, now gaining support from the very people she criticized. This will enable her to get large pharmaceutical dollars in her 2008 Presidential run. Only a President as disgusting as George Bush could make Hillary Clinton seem like a viable candidate, which is no doubt part of the elite plan. Americans will soon be picking their poison. Are we ready to swallow the Clinton pill? In the meantime, Bush is seeking to do everything he can to set up laws that will directly undermine rights of citizens and Americans who protest totalitarian government activities. Playing on the public fear of terrorism, Bush has a new plan to set up secret tribunal courts in our own country and detain enemy combatants, and a new definition for enemy combatant that legal experts believe could easily be extended to any American speaking out against our government. The last time such secret courts existed in a “free people” was in Germany during the rise of Hitler. They were routinely used to harass and execute those who would not follow the Pied Piper, all in the name of national security and eugenics.
It isn’t hard to imagine the conversations taking place at the elite roundtable. “Yes, we are thrilled with the eight years under Bush. We have bigger government, unpayable tax obligations for the next 50 years, socialized drug dispensing, Homeland Security, huge profits for Big Pharma, big oil and the war machine, and near total erosion of the U.S. Constitution. And now that Americans are tired of Bush’s neo-con warmongering, we’ll get Hillary into power next. She’ll socialize medicine, harmonize health laws to repressive international standards, get her husband to run the U.N., do away with American values, and create the international framework to fully implement globalization. Yes, it has been a long eighty-five year fight for supremacy of the New World Order. It has not been easy turning those stubborn freedom-loving Americans into gopher-workers to perpetuate and fund our activities. We are just awaiting the final nails in the coffin. Let’s hope the American middle class fails to wake up. It is only a brief matter of time before our eugenics dream has no opposition.”
Other Feature Articles:
The shocking death of Tim Russert last Friday has left an entire nation wondering what happened. He was a model patient, doing everything his doctors asked. All major media have run articles trying to explain the nuances and difficulties in treating coronary artery disease. These articles find little fault in Russert’s care, trying to create the idea that his heart attack was just too hard to predict and that all that could have been done for him was done. I beg to differ. His death represents the failure of standard medical care to produce a positive result – an occurrence that is all too common in today’s world.
Legions of well wishers look on as Senator Ted Kennedy struggles for his life, fighting against one of the most difficult types of brain tumors. Ironically, it may be the drugs he has so adamantly promoted that are the straw that broke the camel’s back, leading to his brain tumor.
The latest stone thrown at the 200-billion-dollar-a-year cell phone industry came from a study by neurosurgeon Vini G. Khurana entitled Mobile Phone-Brain Tumour: Public Health Advisory. His meta-analysis of existing cell phone studies may not contain a lot of new information; but his rather alarming message was carried by media around the world: “there is a growing body of statistically significant evidence for a relationship between the overall length of use of a mobile phone and the delayed occurrence of a brain tumor on the same side of the head as the ‘preferred side’ for mobile phone usage.” He claimed a 2-4 fold increased risk following 10 years of regular use.
On April 2, 2008 CNN spent the day bringing awareness to the problem of autism. Larry King’s segment, which included Jenny McCarthy along with a panel of guests, was particularly enlightening. My hat is off to Jenny, a celebrity mother who is making it quite uncomfortable for the Center for Disease Control (CDC) to ignore parents of autistic children seeking answers. Why does a mom have to do the work of the CDC? The answer is rather simple: our government’s zeal to insist on too many vaccines while ignoring the actual risks is the driving force behind the autism tragedy.
The Senate is about to approve legislation (Mothers Act – S.1375) which mandates the indoctrination of pregnant and nursing mothers into the use of extremely dangerous psychiatric medication. We already know this class of medication poses serious health risks to both mother and baby. Consequences to the baby are now proven to cause nerve-related changes that can adversely affect health for a lifetime.
Immediate Consumer Action is Needed to Stop Mothers Act The Mothers Act is pending legislation that will indoctrinate hundreds of thousands of mothers into taking dangerous psych drugs. It is a great example of how the Big Pharma lobby controls Congress to the detriment of health, as well as needlessly and dramatically inflating the costs of our health care system for everyone. Like any piece of legislation it purports to address a troubling issue – in this case the mood distress of mothers following birth known as postpartum depression. It is true that 10% - 15% of women need some assistance in dealing with this topic – but the majority of them sure don’t need it from Big Pharma. That is the Big Lie.
It now appears that the FDA Chief Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. has committed perjury before Congress. Unlike Roger Clemens, who also seems to be putting his foot in his mouth before Congress, von Eschenbach’s actions appeared to have allowed unnecessary deaths to Americans – hardly the mission of the FDA. By contrast, Roger Clemens is simply causing death to his own reputation. Hopefully Congress can quit wasting taxpayer money on baseball and get to the bottom of what is really going on at the FDA.
Several high profile human cardiovascular drug experiments have turned into disasters for Big Pharma. These findings are sure to shake the misguided consumer confidence in drugs as a mainstay of preventive cardiovascular health. Hanging in the balance are billions of dollars of fraudulent drug sales based on the flimsy argument that changing numbers (blood sugar, cholesterol, or blood pressure) with the use of toxic drugs is somehow the same as actually being healthy…
Women across the country are being duped to consume billions of dollars worth of bone poisons under the false pretense that if they take them long enough they will not develop osteoporosis. Even the FDA is becoming alarmed by the side effects of these bone drugs. The biggest selling drug in this class is called Fosamax, made by Merck – the very same company that killed thousands of Americans with Vioxx while hiding cardiovascular risks from the FDA and patients. Does anyone trust them?…
Considering that tens of millions of Americans now take statins to lower cholesterol, the following headline was conspicuously absent from the major media this month: “Statins Found to Turn On Gene that Causes Muscle Damage.” It’s now a fact of science; a new study shows that taking statins destroys your muscle to a greater or lesser degree. And let’s not forget that the heart is a muscle.
On November 29, 2007 the FDA made a rather surprising, almost honest announcement. It said that it could not protect Americans from the dangers of drugs. A 56-page report by its Subcommittee on Science and Technology stated the FDA “suffers from serious scientific deficiencies and is not positioned to meet current or emerging regulatory responsibilities.” This blistering report on the life-threatening shortcomings of the FDA was released with the stamp of approval of the head of the FDA, Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. The flagrant disregard for human health by the FDA…
Oprah has done an immense favor to millions of American women by helping them understand that a malfunctioning thyroid gland may indeed be part of their weight and health problems. After writing openly about her thyroid problem in the October 2007 Oprah Magazine, she then went into the nature of thyroid problems on her TV show.
The United States Health Freedom Assembly met October 12 – 14, 2007 at the William Mitchell College of Law in Saint Paul, MN, a gathering of many of the top state, federal, and international health freedom advocates, organizations, and industry. The meeting took on a tone of extreme importance as the FDA has issued policy and obtained broad new regulatory authority over health freedom in the past 12 months. The FDA is seeking to undermine the law known as DSHEA (Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994), the cornerstone of health freedom in America. Emboldened by its new powers the FDA is now poised to trample the first amendment rights of companies and Americans who seek to explain or understand how nutrition can support health. The FDA campaign has begun.
On Wednesday, July 11, 2007 the House passed HR.2900 without allowing the Ron Paul (R-TX) amendments to protect dietary supplements. Representatives Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), John Dingell (D-MI), Henry Waxman (D-CA), and others falsely proclaimed that they were doing America a favor by passing this sweeping FDA-supported legislation that grants the rouge agency more power and money, and even transforms it into a quasi drug company.
The FDA, emboldened by its transformation into a drug company, has embarked upon an anti-American plan of interfering with business and intentionally eliminating various dietary supplement companies from the market. The FDA announcement came on Friday, June 22, 2007 under the guise of a final rule for dietary supplement good manufacturing practices (CGMPs). Within this 800 page rule the FDA states, “We find that this final rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.... Establishments with above average costs, and even establishments with average costs, could be hard pressed to continue to operate. Some of these may decide it is too costly and either change product lines or go out of business.... 140 very small [less than 20 employees] and 32 small dietary supplement manufacturers [less than 500 employees] will be at risk of going out of business.... costs per establishment are proportionally higher for very small than for large establishments....The regulatory costs of this final rule will also discourage new small businesses from entering the industry.”
Under the false pretense of improved food and drug safety the FDA is re-inventing itself as a kingpin drug company. This charade has so far hoodwinked virtually all members of Congress. The Senate has already approved this FDA transformation. The House will bring similar legislation out of committee next week, with a vote in the full House likely in July.
The Andrew von Eschenbach FDA era is upon us. The Avandia scandal is the tip of the iceberg. Is anyone ready? The words “illicit financial collusion” have been replaced by the politically correct term, “collaboration.”
The penalty in China is death, in America its business as usual. Zheng Xiaoyu, the former head of China’s FDA, was sentenced to death for accepting $832,000 in drug company bribes and for dereliction of duty. Like China, our country is in the middle of a drug and food safety crisis. Why is FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. getting a free pass? Why did the Senate just pass legislation (S.1082) that gives von Eschenbach significantly more power to do whatever he pleases? And exactly what is it that von Eschenbach is doing?
Senate Attempts Damage Control – House Braces for Onslaught Senators were taken off guard by the public outrage over the passing of bill S.1082 with language that can be used to seriously harass dietary supplements by enabling the FDA to apply drug-related risk analysis to the safety of food and food ingredients (and thus dietary supplements).
The FDA is Acquiring New Powers to Suppress Alternative Health Your right to have free access to safe and highly effective dietary supplements is under an intense multi-pronged FDA attack. On May 14, 2007 the Supreme Court sided with the FDA by deciding not to hear the case of Nutraceutical v FDA, letting stand a federal appeals court ruling that permits the FDA to use drug-related risk/ benefit analysis to determine if a nutrient is safe.
The Senate has sold out the American people. Anyone voting for change in the last election can now plainly see the shenanigans of a Democratic-controlled Senate. Under Republicans no FDA reform ever took place. Big Pharma owns so many Republicans that all meaningful legislation to curtail the deaths and injuries of American citizens at the hands of Big Pharma and the FDA had been completely thwarted for the past six years. Under Democratic control sweeping FDA reform favorable to Big Pharma was proposed and the majority of meaningful reform was blocked or seriously watered down. Which is worse? As Kennedy stated in his opening remarks today, S1082 (the Kennedy/Enzi FDA bill) was an “elaborate scheme.”
For approximately four days Americans lived in a delusional state that they may soon pay drug prices the same as every other country in the civilized world. Euphoria over breaking the Big Pharma monopoly turned to disgust as the chameleon, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA), changed sides and lead a contingency of Democrats against fellow Democrats lead by Byron Dorgan (D-ND). By passing the Cochran amendment the Dorgan amendment is poisoned and will no longer be effective. Maybe Democrats are now learning what Republicans have known for some time – you can’t trust Kennedy.
In May of 2006, after months of research and investigation, I published my ominous findings in the book Fight for Your Health: Exposing the FDA’s Betrayal of America. Everything I predicted in this book is on the fast track to becoming reality. A majority of Americans, not informed on current events and unaware of the history involved, are silent. Mainstream media, one of Big Pharma’s largest clients, is silent. Only the power of the internet, which rivals the invention of the printing press in significance, is making it possible for individuals to understand what is going on.
There is still time to stop FDA, Inc. Bill S1082 is a bill that helps fund the FDA with Big Pharma money. It is known all over Capital Hill as Big Pharma-designed legislation. It is running into all sorts of credibility problems. A vote is likely on Monday – delayed due to all the opposition flooding the Senate by “we the people.”
S1082 Update – Tuesday’s Activity. Fight Erupts on Senate floor: As the Senate continues to debate the Big Pharma-friendly sweeping reform of the FDA a new problem for Big Pharma’s prize Senators has erupted and quickly turned into confrontation on the floor of the Senate. At stake is at least 10 billion dollars per year in exorbitant Big Pharma profits. In one corner is Big Pharma-puppet Orrin Hatch (R-UT), representing the Kennedy/Enzi drug cartel. In the other corner is a majority of Senators lead by Byron Dorgan (D-ND).
The combination of a lack of sun and cold weather invariably strains your mood as well as your metabolism. It is an energy-depleting form of stress, similar to having a daily argument with someone. If your energy systems…
S1082 Update – Monday’s Activity at the bottom of this article. Bill S1082: The Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act (also called the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 2007) is one of the greatest scams and con jobs ever foisted on the American public. Current FDA management is grossly incompetent on the subject of drug safety.
A new attack against health freedom, drug safety, and dietary supplements was launched last week by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) with major support from Michael Enzi (R-WY). It is called the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act (S1082). This legislation was planned over the past few years working hand-in-glove with the FDA’s dysfunctional management and legal team – meaning this legislation was written for the profits of Big Pharma and Big Biotech AT THE EXPENSE OF SAFETY AND HUMAN HEALTH.
Americans are up in arms that our pets are being injured and killed by a toxin sent to America by a Chinese company. Melamine, a toxic fertilizer used in China, is the suspected culprit behind the deaths and injuries to potentially hundreds of thousands of our pets. The FDA assures us that this toxin has not entered the human food supply – does anyone believe in the competence of the FDA? It is only a matter of time before this type of problem happens to humans, as the inept FDA has no control over imported food intended for humans, let alone pets.
On February 13, 2007 the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations opened hearings lambasting the FDA regarding the safety of drugs. The opening statement by Chairman John Dingell (D-MI) set the tone, “It is clear … that the FDA is badly broken. I expect that before we finish this investigation, which is just getting underway, we will discover whether the problems we have found are due to the work of scoundrels, irrational penny-pinching, or because the doors to the FDA “hen house” have been thrown open to foxes. It may be a combination of all three.”
Wall Street, international bankers, President Bush, pharmaceutical companies, new biotech companies, the Rockefeller empire, and the FDA have created a new plan for public health. It is a grand vision based on profit. It will use the FDA and, as needed, the Department of Homeland Security as the regulatory police force that ensures compliance in the name of public safety. Legitimate objections may be overpowered in the name of national security.
|
| Home > Health News > The Politics Of Health: Feature Article |
